Definition: For Ahaz took away a portion [out] of the house of the LORD, and [out] of the house of the king, and of the princes, and gave [it] unto the king of Assyria: but he helped him not.

Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 28:21. It’s a really important and somewhat unsettling passage about a significant betrayal. Here’s a simple explanation: What it says: “For Ahaz took away a portion [out] of the house of the LORD, and [out] of the house of the king, and of the princes, and gave [it] unto the king of Assyria: but he helped him not.” Let’s unpack it word by word: “For Ahaz” : This refers to King Ahaz of Judah. He was a ruler who had previously been very pious and sought God's guidance, but later became more focused on his own power and wealth. “took away a portion [out] of the house of the LORD” : This is where it gets tricky. “The house of the Lord” refers to God himself – His presence and holiness. Taking away something from God means he was deliberately trying to diminish or control Him. It suggests a loss of connection with God’s will. “and [out] of the house of the king” : This indicates that King Ahaz was also taking something – perhaps resources, land, or influence – away from his own kingdom. It's not just about him; it’s about the entire nation of Judah being vulnerable to outside control. “and of the princes” : This refers to the royal advisors and officials of the king. They were meant to protect and serve the king, but this act of betrayal undermines their role. “and gave [it] unto the king of Assyria” : Ahaz was handing over a significant amount – resources, power, and potentially even control – to a neighboring kingdom, Assyria. “but he helped him not” : This is the crucial part. It means that King Ahaz didn’t actively assist or support the king of Assyria in any way. He didn't offer protection, guidance, or anything that would have hindered the Assyrian's actions. What does this verse mean? This story is a warning about the dangers of idolatry and the importance of staying connected to God. It speaks to: Political Corruption: It highlights how powerful rulers can be tempted to prioritize their own interests over what’s right – even if it means compromising with an enemy. Loss of Faith: It emphasizes that true faith requires a relationship with God, not just political power or personal gain. When people become consumed by worldly ambitions, they risk losing their connection to the divine. The Significance of Divine Protection: The verse underscores how crucial it is for rulers to be guided and protected by God’s presence and will. In essence, this passage warns against a dangerous path – one where power becomes corrupted and people turn away from their relationship with God. --- Do you want me to: Explain a specific part of the verse in more detail? Discuss the historical context surrounding this event? Connect this story to other biblical stories or themes?